Russell and the Neo-Logicists
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Argument of Possibility and necessity encountering the critiques of Russell, Hume, and Kant
The argument of possibility and necessity- which is considered as some of the most important arguments in proving the existence of God - have taken a key place in humanschr('39') thoughts. In history, among thinkers related to the creation of the universe, no major philosopher or thinker can be found other than those who have faced this argument; thus this argument has met many criticisms an...
متن کاملFrege, Russell and Wittgenstein
Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein were founders (although not by any means the sole founders) of the analytic tradition in philosophy; but they did not found the philosophy of language, which has roots stretching back much further. Their principal contribution, indeed, could be regarded as being in the opposite direction: it is not so much that they applied philosophical methods to the study of l...
متن کاملPredicativity , the Russell - Myhill Paradox , and
1 Introduction ✤ Just as there is the Russell paradox about sets, so there is the Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions. ✤ While predicativity has been well-explored as a response to the Russell paradox of sets, there seems to have been no previous attempt to set out a predicative solution to the Russell-Myhill paradox of propositions. ✤ The aim of this talk is to do that, within the framework...
متن کاملThe spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
Context. The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram is a key diagnostic diagram for stellar structure and evolution, which is now in use for more than 100 years. Aims. We introduce a new diagram which is based on the gravity-effective temperature diagram, but has various advantages. Methods. Our spectroscopic Hertzsprung-Russell (sHR) diagram shows the inverse of the flux-mean gravity versus the effective...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0453-0691,1884-1228
DOI: 10.4288/jafpos.25.0_1